In 2006, U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, proclaimed that the Republican members of Congress had no more immediate goal than to see that President Obama was not allowed a second term. A fellow Republican, I was aghast to think, given all that we faced as a nation, that he and the other Republican leaders might have no greater aspiration than to spend the next four years thwarting the President at every turn and trying to deny him a second term.

The President was reelected in spite of McConnell's efforts but, although he'd spent the previous four trying to fulfill the promise of obstinacy he'd made four years earlier, his fellow Republicans then elected McConnell Majority Leader. Having failed to keep the President from being reelected, his goal now was simply to continue to scupper and frustrate at every turn and to do that from a much more powerful position as Majority Leader.

Most recently, within only a few hours of Justice Scalia's death, McConnell announced that the Senate would not consider, would not even hold hearings to consider, whomever the President appoints as a replacement, notwithstanding that the Constitution provides unequivocally that the President shall nominate for the Senate's consideration candidates to fill Supreme Court vacancies when they occur.

While the Constitution does not deny the Senate the option of rejecting whomever the President presents for their consideration, it does impose upon the President the responsibility of appointing someone and the clear implication is that the Senate should give that appointment meaningful consideration.

For McConnell to announce that he will not even allow a name to be brought forth is yet another example of him putting his astonishingly petty grudges way out in front of the business of running this country and securing its place in the world. I'm ashamed to think he speaks for Republicans but the sad truth is: that he does, and there are clearly not enough of us out there who feel the way I do about him to make a difference.

I've been hopeful nonetheless that someone would come along who would restore the Party to the noble ideals I and my family thought it espoused when I first joined in 1962. Sadly, it is now looking more and likely that an exceedingly crude and thuggish oaf who has driven several businesses into bankruptcy, who champions the brutal treatment of those he finds unworthy, who purposely avoided military service, who has used government prerogatives and money to subvert the rights of others and who can more and more often not frame a relevant answer to a simple and sensible question will likely be the Republican Party's nominee for President.

Even more troubling is the blindly compliant nature of the large crowds to whom his bombast, his barely disguised contempt for women and minorities everywhere, his eagerness to bomb the hell out of everyone who crosses his path and to restore waterboarding is somehow laudable. As if by employing means and attitudes such as these we will 'make America great again' as he vacantly promises....

America will become great again when we can demonstrate that we truly care about our fellow human beings, when the growing disparity between the haves and the have nots is meaningfully diminished, when legislation is created by people who represent us instead of whoever has the most money and when the White House and Congress consists of folks who are truly thoughtful and care more about this country than they do about their own legacy. Clearly that's not going to happen if the likely Republican candidate prevails.

Phil Crossman lives on Vinalhaven

More Phil Crossman

• Been a good boy this year, Phil?

• Maine State ferries, able-bodied seamen and safe transits

• Droopy pants indignities

• Looking for snow

• In the company of community

• Reliable phone service vital on an island where cell reception is spotty

• The ‘historic’ storm, fluid dynamics and a toilet bowl